Date:	Sat, 10 Mar 2001 19:53:49 +0200
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Message-Id:	<7704-Sat10Mar2001195349+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.6
In-reply-to:	<3aa7c5f5.208835@news.redshift.com> (damon@WRONG.redshift.com)
Subject:	Re: GPROF reports zero time spent?
References:	<3aa69f21 DOT 386105 AT news DOT redshift DOT com> <9867vf$9ts$1 AT nets3 DOT rz DOT RWTH-Aachen DOT DE> <3aa6b9b7 DOT 800087 AT news DOT redshift DOT com> <7263-Thu08Mar2001090237+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <3aa7c5f5 DOT 208835 AT news DOT redshift DOT com>
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: damon AT WRONG DOT redshift DOT com (Damon Casale)
> Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
> Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2001 17:59:12 GMT
> >> 
> >> Hmm.  Apparently, I already have DJGPP v2.03.
> >
> >Are you sure?  The above output surely look amazingly similar to the
> >problem with v2.02 library described in the FAQ.  How did you check
> >that you have v2.03?
> 
> I checked my install directory.  I have the BinUtils 2.9.5.1 (or
> however you arrange the dots) zip file there.  I checked the date/time
> stamp of gprof in the zip file and compared it with the gprof on my
> test machine.  Same date/time stamp, same file size.

Gprof is not the problem: the bug described in the FAQ was in the
DJGPP library, and it affected the profiled code, not Gprof itself.
That is, the profiled code would report bogus profile data.

- Raw text -