From:	Jason Green <news AT jgreen4 DOT fsnet DOT co DOT uk>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: 18-sector limit with biosdisk()
Date:	Fri, 09 Feb 2001 22:37:15 +0000
Organization:	Customer of Energis Squared
Lines:	25
Message-ID:	<grr88t07mo06ut5ebcmb9cmal8dcmspibo@4ax.com>
References:	<c2l38toalpafu97en8dn583pmm6ju6haqa AT 4ax DOT com> <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010208100550 DOT 20284C AT is> <3jo78to69hpd1d0m128fcgk26a3th2qggv AT 4ax DOT com> <2593-Fri09Feb2001165411+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	modem-166.vanadium.dialup.pol.co.uk
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	newsg2.svr.pol.co.uk 981758235 31793 62.136.22.166 (9 Feb 2001 22:37:15 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	9 Feb 2001 22:37:15 GMT
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT theplanet DOT net
X-Newsreader:	Forte Agent 1.7/32.534
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> wrote:

> > > Does this mean that if we bump the limit to 21 sectors, programs might 
> > > choke with som BIOSes?
> > 
> > Yes - unless you think it could mean something else.
> 
> English is not my first language.  If you aren't sure as well, perhaps
> we should ask whoever wrote that.

I'm not familiar enough with BIOS level programming to understand
exactly what biosdisk() does or what the OP wants to do with it, but
when I saw that DJGPP had an 18-sector limit I remembered the earlier
post and an alarm bell rang.

> > If there is some doubt then it would be worth to do a simple test
> > before any serious development work on libc.
> 
> If there's a chance of breaking the library by this change, I think we
> better not do it.  People who need to read non-standard floppies can
> always use __dpmi_int directly.

I'm not saying libc will break.  If someone wants to post a complete
test example I would be happy to test it with the BIOS that choked
trying to boot Linux kernel from an oversize floppy.

- Raw text -