Date:	Wed, 07 Feb 2001 19:20:01 +0200
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	ebotcazou AT libertysurf DOT fr
Message-Id:	<8011-Wed07Feb2001192000+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.6
CC:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<001501c09115$4dfc6060$fe8524d5@zephyr>
	(ebotcazou AT libertysurf DOT fr)
Subject:	Re: Win2k vs Win NT4
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010207153830 DOT 4599Y-100000 AT is> <001501c09115$4dfc6060$fe8524d5 AT zephyr>
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: "Eric Botcazou" <ebotcazou AT libertysurf DOT fr>
> Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 15:49:43 +0100
> 
> > Not at all.  There are additional aspects of NT vs W2K differences which 
> > other library functions would want to know about.
> 
> I was talking about the Allegro library, I don't know for other programs.
> What are the other main differences between WinNT4 and Win2k ?

One is that programs nested more than 2 levels cause NTVDM to crash on
W2K, but not on NT.  The other is that the LFN function that renames a
file fails on W2K with a weird error code if the target file already
exists (this is known to cause linking to fail when GCC runs stubify).

There might be other differences, I don't remember.  You might
consider looking in the mail archives, there were quite a few reports
about W2K woes.

- Raw text -