Delivered-To:	fixup-djgpp AT delorie DOT com@fixme
Message-ID:	<000701c08d3d$31dc0c40$fb27e13f@acer>
From:	"Donald Stevens" <dstevens6 AT qwest DOT net>
To:	<djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
References:	<3A7A936D DOT 26718 DOT 224451 AT localhost>
Subject:	Re: Is ATI Rage video board supported?
Date:	Fri, 2 Feb 2001 10:25:50 -0700
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

The VESA driver works ok, thanks for the suggestion.
Donald Stevens



----- Original Message ----- 
From: <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
To: Donald Stevens <dstevens6 AT qwest DOT net>; <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 2:01 AM
Subject: Re: Is ATI Rage video board supported?


> On 1 Feb 2001, at 17:04, Donald Stevens wrote:
> 
> > I have made  libgrx20.a ok using the make files and
> > setting   grx20drv=mach64.   But the modetest
> > program (and my own programs) do not work
> > properly beyond 640x480x256
> > My video board is ATI Rage with mach 64 chip.
> > All works ok in Linux and win98.
> > What reasonably priced video boards will work
> > properly with grx?
> > Donald Stevens      dstevens6 AT qwest DOT net
> > 
> 
> Do You really need to use mach64 driver?
> 
> I used VESA driver for Rage2C based card (ATI 3D CHARGER) and
> it worked OK. VESA driver works for more cards and as result is also 
> more tested.
> 
> Andris
> 
> PS. Of course fixing possible problems with Mach64 driver would be 
> nice ...

- Raw text -