Date:	Wed, 31 Jan 2001 19:41:42 +0200
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	JT Williams <jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org>
Message-Id:	<8011-Wed31Jan2001194141+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.6
CC:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<20010131102557.A2585@kendall.sfbr.org> (message from JT Williams
	on Wed, 31 Jan 2001 10:25:57 -0600)
Subject:	Re: newbie
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010129082033 DOT 28507L-100000 AT is> <slrn97bapv DOT 4d2 DOT rpolzer AT rebounce DOT rpolzer-lx> <9597vh$n6u$1 AT nets3 DOT rz DOT RWTH-Aachen DOT DE> <20010131102557 DOT A2585 AT kendall DOT sfbr DOT org>
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 10:25:57 -0600
> From: JT Williams <jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org>
> 
> Are there *any* advantages (other than being able to run DOS batch
> files), to loading bash on top of command.com?

Not that I know of.

> IOW, is there any good reason *not* to load bash as your primary
> shell?

Some DOS-extended programs don't live well with being run from a DPMI
program.

- Raw text -