From:	"Tanes Sriviroolchai" <Tanes DOT Sriviroolchai AT Thailand DOT NCR DOT COM>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Weird results of log( -1.0 ) with libm.a and without libm.a
Date:	Thu, 11 Jan 2001 16:49:21 +0700
Lines:	36
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Newsreader:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host:	192.127.136.173
Message-ID:	<3a5d81c9@rpc1284.daytonoh.ncr.com>
X-Original-Trace:	11 Jan 2001 04:50:01 -0500, 192.127.136.173
NNTP-Posting-Host:	ncrnews.daytonoh.ncr.com
X-Trace:	11 Jan 2001 09:20:17 -0500, ncrnews.daytonoh.ncr.com
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Hi,
   I'm currently using DJGPP 2.03, gcc 2.95.2. The following short program
gives the different result when using libm.a and when not using libm.a.

#include <stdio.h>
#include <math.h>

main()
{
    double    y;

    y = log( -1.0 );
    printf( "%f\n", y );

    return 0;
}

gcc -o test1.exe test1.c
when running you will get

NaN

This is expected result. However if I compile using
gcc -o test1.exe test1.c -lm
and then running, you will get

-Inf

Is there a report of this error before?

Regards,
Tanes Sriviroolchai

- Raw text -