delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Sun, 31 Dec 2000 12:34:37 +0200 |
From: | "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
Sender: | halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il |
To: | "Tom ST Denis" <tstdenis3160 AT home DOT com> |
Message-Id: | <1190-Sun31Dec2000123437+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> |
X-Mailer: | Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.6 |
CC: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
In-reply-to: | <nuy36.54098$59.15020373@news3.rdc1.on.home.com> |
(tstdenis3160 AT home DOT com) | |
Subject: | Re: Support for higher end cpus |
References: | <f_v36.53630$59 DOT 14770834 AT news3 DOT rdc1 DOT on DOT home DOT com> <92mb9j$soc$1 AT slb6 DOT atl DOT mindspring DOT net> <nuy36.54098$59 DOT 15020373 AT news3 DOT rdc1 DOT on DOT home DOT com> |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> From: "Tom ST Denis" <tstdenis3160 AT home DOT com> > Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp > Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2000 04:20:35 GMT > > But the optimizations the authors must have been thinking of > when they did DJGPP for the i486 are not always what you want for an i686 or > k6. My point is that newer opts may have been missed. GCC is constantly developed, and DJGPP gets the latest versions. The current version definitely has 686-specific support. As for K6 or K7, its support might be less efficient; I don't know. But we definitely do NOT use a compiler whose optimization development stopped at 486.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |