Mail Archives: djgpp/2000/12/24/00:46:09
On Sat, 23 Dec 2000, Jason Green wrote:
> > But C99 defines about a dozen more conversion specifiers which aren't
> > supported by DJGPP right now. It would be nice to add them as well.
>
> I agree, but this all takes time. If %z is fixed now shouldn't it go
> in?
I didn't say it shouldn't. But fixing %z alone doesn't sound like a big
win to me. Also, the docs needs to be amended to describe %z.
> None of these seem particularly critical, at least no more so than %z.
Each one of them is not critical, but together they achieve a significant
goal: making strftime C99-compatible.
> Which major new functionality from C99 are you refering to?
I meant all the other functions defined by C99 which we don't have.
> BTW, if I fill a struct tm with values for 0/Jan/YYYY, then call
> mktime(), it should be modified to 31/Dec/(YYYY-1), right? This isn't
> happening.
Please post a complete example.
- Raw text -