Mail Archives: djgpp/2000/12/22/10:33:42
> From: Jason Green <news AT jgreen4 DOT fsnet DOT co DOT uk>
> Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2000 12:53:08 +0000
>
> > > Perhaps you could try my test program too, and tell if it does what
> > > you expect it should?
> >
> > I get similar results to what you reported:
> >
> > Fri, 22 Dec 2000 09:53:58 +0000 GMT
> > Fri, 22 Dec 2000 11:53:58 +7200 IST
> > Thu, 21 Dec 2000 21:19:58 -0000 TEST1
> > Fri, 22 Dec 2000 22:27:58 +38040 TEST2
> >
> > I.e., the issue with negative offsets is reproducible. But that's not
> > what the original message was talking about, IIRC. The results in the
> > original message were completely bogus, which I couldn't reproduce.
>
> I think the original message talked about the GMT offsets printed by
> %z being wrong.
Yes, ``wrong'' a.k.a. ``bogus''.
> In respect of %z, what needs to be done to make strftime() compliant
> with current standards?
It should work like in glibc.
But C99 defines about a dozen more conversion specifiers which aren't
supported by DJGPP right now. It would be nice to add them as well.
- Raw text -