From:	"Doug" <deleveld AT dds DOT nl>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Help! function typedef
Date:	11 Dec 2000 17:12:13 GMT
Organization:	none
Lines:	16
Message-ID:	<01c06396$d935cd80$b8247d81@doug>
References:	<3a30b1a8$0$24264 AT diablo DOT uninet DOT ee> <006101c06103$dc9dd020$aa4d57cb AT spunky> <3a34d45e$0$24309 AT diablo DOT uninet DOT ee>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	client36-184.oprit.rug.nl
X-Trace:	info.service.rug.nl 976554733 11675 129.125.36.184 (11 Dec 2000 17:12:13 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	newsmaster AT rug DOT nl
NNTP-Posting-Date:	11 Dec 2000 17:12:13 GMT
X-Newsreader:	Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1155
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

> NO NO NO. I wrote:
> typedef int (MY_FUNC_TYPE)(void);
> 
> MY_FUNC func
>  {
>   return 0;
>  }

Are you sure this ic C?  I've been programming a long time and have never
seen anything like this before.  I'm not certian, but I don't think this is
allowed ny the C language.  Just because Borland has some wierd extensions
doesn't mean than DJGPP should have them to.

I think you are better using somekind of macro to do what I think you want.

Doug

- Raw text -