Message-ID:	<3A2D07C6.26C2F1EF@sensor.com>
From:	Ron Natalie <ron AT sensor DOT com>
Organization:	Sensor Systems
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
Newsgroups:	comp.lang.c++,comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: STL broken?
References:	<3A2C3ACD DOT 18F8C1D5 AT usq DOT edu DOT au> <zy_W5.44669$2A2 DOT 2187120 AT news20 DOT bellglobal DOT com> <3A2C8027 DOT 427A293D AT usq DOT edu DOT au> <90i15h$9d$1 AT bob DOT news DOT rcn DOT net> <3A2C8E5A DOT 1EDCC75C AT usq DOT edu DOT au>
Lines:	16
Date:	Tue, 05 Dec 2000 10:20:38 -0500
NNTP-Posting-Host:	156.40.240.200
X-Trace:	mencken.net.nih.gov 976029807 156.40.240.200 (Tue, 05 Dec 2000 10:23:27 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Tue, 05 Dec 2000 10:23:27 EST
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Ron House wrote:
> As far as I can see, the code is too simple to be broken.
> 
> #include <vector>
> using namespace std;  // Tried with & without this line
> main() {
>        std::vector<std::vector<int> > i;
>        // Tried with & without the "std::"
>        return 0;
> }
> 

The code is broken (needs a int return on main), but that's not your problem
either.

- Raw text -