From:	"Bart Kowalski" <me AT nospam DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.lang.c++,comp.os.msdos.djgpp
References:	<3A2C3ACD DOT 18F8C1D5 AT usq DOT edu DOT au>
Subject:	Re: STL broken?
Lines:	22
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Newsreader:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700
Message-ID:	<zy_W5.44669$2A2.2187120@news20.bellglobal.com>
Date:	Tue, 05 Dec 2000 04:54:55 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host:	64.229.164.191
X-Trace:	news20.bellglobal.com 975992095 64.229.164.191 (Mon, 04 Dec 2000 23:54:55 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Mon, 04 Dec 2000 23:54:55 EST
Organization:	Sympatico
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

> I believe the latest version of the STL is fatally broken, to the extent
> that trivial programs will not compile. As this version is distributed
> in DJGPP and, I believe, Linux, I am wondering why no one else has
> noticed this. The version of the STL I refer to is on
>
> http://www.sgi.com/Technology/STL/download.html
>
> as version 3.3.
>
> An example of a line it won't compile is:
>
> vector<vector<int> > m;
>
> as found on page 836 of Stroustrup.

You forgot the namespace qualifier. See chapter 8 of the same book.


Bart.

- Raw text -