From:	Ron House <house AT usq DOT edu DOT au>
Newsgroups:	comp.lang.c++,comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	STL broken?
Date:	Tue, 05 Dec 2000 00:46:05 +0000
Organization:	University of Queensland
Lines:	25
Message-ID:	<3A2C3ACD.18F8C1D5@usq.edu.au>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	heracles.usq.edu.au
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	bunyip.cc.uq.edu.au 975977136 3227 139.86.208.29 (5 Dec 2000 00:45:36 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	news AT uq DOT edu DOT au
NNTP-Posting-Date:	5 Dec 2000 00:45:36 GMT
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 3.04 (X11; I; Linux 2.0.36 i586)
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host:	139.86.23.17
X-Original-Trace:	5 Dec 2000 10:45:25 +1000, 139.86.23.17
X-Abuse:	abuse AT usq DOT edu DOT au
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

I believe the latest version of the STL is fatally broken, to the extent
that trivial programs will not compile. As this version is distributed
in DJGPP and, I believe, Linux, I am wondering why no one else has
noticed this. The version of the STL I refer to is on

http://www.sgi.com/Technology/STL/download.html

as version 3.3.

An example of a line it won't compile is:

vector<vector<int> > m;

as found on page 836 of Stroustrup.

On the other hand, version 3.2 on that same site works correctly with
the most complex templates I have in my programs.

Have I missed something here?

-- 
Ron House     house AT usq DOT edu DOT au
              http://www.sci.usq.edu.au/staff/house

A rose grows in the Earth's good soil.

- Raw text -