From:	"Graham Reeds" <grahamr AT dtn DOT ntl DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1001126130620 DOT 4375B-100000 AT is>
Subject:	Re: Buffering text...(additional).
Lines:	10
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Newsreader:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Message-ID:	<gXeU5.14033$vA4.257421@news6-win.server.ntlworld.com>
Date:	Sun, 26 Nov 2000 21:06:14 -0000
NNTP-Posting-Host:	62.254.79.144
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT ntlworld DOT com
X-Trace:	news6-win.server.ntlworld.com 975272780 62.254.79.144 (Sun, 26 Nov 2000 21:06:20 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Sun, 26 Nov 2000 21:06:20 GMT
Organization:	ntlworld News Service
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> wrote in message
news:Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1001126130620 DOT 4375B-100000 AT is...

> Use cprintf instead of printf (and "\r\n" instead of "\n").  printf
> doesn't pay attention to what textcolor does.

I've also noticed a large performance hit when using printf("\r\n"); instead
of printf("\n");

- Raw text -