From:	"Ian Miller" <Ian AT shelob DOT plus DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
References:	<dphq0tk3q379loiideccpcmrn4ga535nfl AT 4ax DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Array Size Question
Lines:	21
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Newsreader:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Message-ID:	<IlvP5.506$I5.2815@stones>
Date:	Sun, 12 Nov 2000 11:44:31 -0000
NNTP-Posting-Host:	212.159.41.201
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT plus DOT net DOT uk
X-Trace:	stones 974029288 212.159.41.201 (Sun, 12 Nov 2000 11:41:28 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Sun, 12 Nov 2000 11:41:28 GMT
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

<chris319> wrote in message
news:dphq0tk3q379loiideccpcmrn4ga535nfl AT 4ax DOT com...
> By default, what is the maximum array size in gcc and how can I set up an
array
> larger than the default size?

Essentially, there is no maximum array size "in gcc".
The mechanisms it employs to implement the C
programming language's array subscripting
probably result in an effective maximum, but that
isn't going to be your problem.  It isn't gcc you
want to worry about, it's the C or C++ that you
are writing.  I suggest you post a short example
of the code that doesn't work in this newsgroup
(or, better, comp.lang.c) and someone may be
able to help you.

Ian

- Raw text -