delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | kendall.sfbr.org: jeffw set sender to jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org using -f |
Date: | Thu, 9 Nov 2000 14:41:50 -0600 |
From: | JT Williams <jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org> |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: UTOD & DTOU |
Message-ID: | <20001109144150.B22025@kendall.sfbr.org> |
References: | <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1001109161040 DOT 22401A-100000 AT is> <3A0B0215 DOT 76590FDC AT bigfoot DOT com> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
In-Reply-To: | <3A0B0215.76590FDC@bigfoot.com>; from richdawe@bigfoot.com on Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 07:59:17PM +0000 |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
-: > Aren't there unix2dos and dos2unix programs available for Linux? I -: > dimly remeber those from my HP-UX days. They're filters, so usage -: > won't be exactly the same as dtou/utod though. -: -: Exactly! Since these programs read stdin and write stdout, they cannot -: be used to convert many files in one go At one point I foolishly aliased `dos2unix' to `dtou' and `unix2dos' to `utod' just so my DJGPP-box would feel more unixy. But as Eli pointed out, the programs *are* rather different, and I soon mangled enough files to convince me to remove the aliases.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |