From:	Richard Dawe <richdawe AT bigfoot DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: IPC on Windows
Date:	Wed, 25 Oct 2000 22:31:09 +0100
Organization:	Customer of Energis Squared
Lines:	30
Message-ID:	<39F7511D.84AD3417@bigfoot.com>
References:	<39F48949 DOT 3FF0CDD7 AT bigfoot DOT com> <Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 10 DOT 10010241425410 DOT 1624-100000 AT baby DOT siemens DOT ebp DOT ii3 DOT b-rail DOT be> <dftdvss3svfibmejbtt7rv0pu9dmdg1uip AT 4ax DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	modem-154.elessar.dialup.pol.co.uk
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	news6.svr.pol.co.uk 972509534 26254 62.136.185.154 (25 Oct 2000 21:32:14 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	25 Oct 2000 21:32:14 GMT
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT theplanet DOT net
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.51 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.17 i586)
X-Accept-Language:	de,fr
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

Damian Yerrick wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 24 Oct 2000 14:33:08 +0200 (CEST), Dieter Demerre
> <ext DOT dieter DOT demerre AT siemens DOT be> wrote:
> 
> >bind()
> >gethostbyname()
> >socket()
> >select()
> 
> These functions are available in Winsock, a port of BSD sockets to
> Windows.

Winsock isn't a port of BSD sockets. It's a new API that is compatible in
most ways with the BSD sockets API. There are some subtle and
not-so-subtle differences between BSD sockets and Winsock - see the
Winsock Programmers FAQ:

    http://www.cyberport.com/~tangent/programming/winsock/

In particular Windows and Unix do asynchronous I/O on sockets in a
completely different way.

Bye,

-- 
Richard Dawe
[ mailto:richdawe AT bigfoot DOT com | http://www.bigfoot.com/~richdawe/ ]

- Raw text -