From:	"Edmund Horner" <ejrh AT paradise DOT net DOT nz>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
References:	<971736308 DOT 16558 DOT 0 DOT pluto DOT c3ade8b7 AT news DOT demon DOT nl> <8shsqg$ccq$03$1 AT news DOT t-online DOT com>
Subject:	Re: C source compiling
Lines:	30
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Newsreader:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Organization:	Paradise Net
Message-ID:	<971838376.925094@shelley.paradise.net.nz>
Cache-Post-Path:	shelley.paradise.net.nz!unknown AT 203-96-148-136 DOT tnt0 DOT paradise DOT net DOT nz
X-Cache:	nntpcache 2.4.0b5 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/)
Date:	Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:07:02 +1300
NNTP-Posting-Host:	203.96.152.26
X-Complaints-To:	newsadmin AT xtra DOT co DOT nz
X-Trace:	news.xtra.co.nz 971838378 203.96.152.26 (Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:06:18 NZDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:06:18 NZDT
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Perhaps if you ran it through some kind of "code compressor", it would
become a lot smaller.  I believe that most source code is many times larger
than it technically needs to be in ordre to behave.

* Get rid of comments and excess whitespace.
* Use the shortest conceivable identifiers.
* Possibly even use #define's to collapse commonly occurying sequences of
code...

"Peter Remmers" <Peter DOT Remmers AT t-online DOT de> wrote in message
news:8shsqg$ccq$03$1 AT news DOT t-online DOT com...
>
> r i v a <webnews AT MAPSONrivari DOT MAPSONdemon DOT nl> schrieb...
>
> > Is there somebody wellwilling to compile a 2420 bytes big
> > c source file, for using under dos.
>
> Hmm, if your source weren't that big, you could have tries
> the public access compiler service on DJ Delorie's pages:
>
> http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/compile/
>
> It compiles sources up to 1000 bytes.
>
> Peter
>
>
>

- Raw text -