From:	Damian Yerrick <Bullcr_pd_yerrick AT hotmail DOT comRemoveBullcr_p>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	qsort's algorithm
Organization:	Pin Eight Software http://pineight.8m.com/
Message-ID:	<tf4qusk3quottc52jj9cmuhmqlvk48cgm7@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader:	Forte Agent 1.7/32.534
MIME-Version:	1.0
Lines:	11
X-Trace:	/wsFGz/o+fdcMDq1vTba1SuRhFpn0LLL+Cq7IOIGuVo+3L9Qi1RGMRGsk44JPBxm0Pbf2spSF5a4!lyerpFzvZvlbfGBLkhZVvLTLTDfQWkJ4mh0sVviHPhDC4XbEy7u8oYgMKzrg3H5tXUkW4SO2cREN!BTJgSQ==
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT gte DOT net
X-Abuse-Info:	Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-Info:	Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Wed, 18 Oct 2000 03:02:12 GMT
Distribution:	world
Date:	Wed, 18 Oct 2000 03:02:12 GMT
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

From what I understand of the C standard, qsort() can use any decent
sorting algorithm.  Does DJGPP libc's qsort() have bad performance on
already sorted data?

-- 
<O
( \   GNOME vs. KDE: the game!
 X    http://pineight.8m.com/nes.htm

This is McAfee VirusScan. Add these two lines to your signature to
prevent the spread of signature viruses.  http://www.mcafee.com/

- Raw text -