Date:	Wed, 4 Oct 2000 08:25:56 +0200 (IST)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Building gdb 5.0
In-Reply-To:	<39DA32AC.26661.C0492@localhost>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1001004082416.21716A-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, 3 Oct 2000 pavenis AT lanet DOT lv wrote:

> > > Unpacking and configuring was Ok (except not significant 
> > > filename conflicts).
> > 
> > Hmm?  The special batch file which you should use to unpack is
> > supposed to rename files on the fly to prevent these conflicts.  How
> > come it didn't work for you?
> > 
> 
> This was mentioned in initial announcement about GDB-5.0 in DJGPP mailing list:
> 
> http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/mail-archives/browse.cgi?p=djgpp/2000/05/23/07:00:55	

Ah, those.  Sorry, I forgot about this glitch.  (The GDB maintainer 
promised in the future to wait a bit more than a few hours between the 
last pretest and the release, to avoid last-minute problems such as this 
one.)

- Raw text -