From:	"Marie-France" <mariapaquita AT hotmail DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	DJGPP and C++ standard
Lines:	21
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Newsreader:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Message-ID:	<%vPy5.1883$C7.75408@wagner.videotron.net>
Date:	Fri, 22 Sep 2000 16:46:25 -0400
NNTP-Posting-Host:	24.201.183.70
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT videotron DOT net
X-Trace:	wagner.videotron.net 969655419 24.201.183.70 (Fri, 22 Sep 2000 16:43:39 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Fri, 22 Sep 2000 16:43:39 EDT
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Hi. I haven't been around for a while (I'm posting under a friend's
account).
I'm starting computer engineering and the stupid teacher insists on using
Visual C++ (and he only gives the assignment in a Word .doc file on the
website. what a loser)
Anyway, I know better :). I'm not installing a 300 meg compiler just to
compile a program that solves a linear system of equations... I'll use DJGPP
:)

But my question is: How up to date with the latest and greatest C++ standard
draft? is it as up to date as Visual C++?

will I have any problem compiling C++ code for a class that doesn't even
touch classes (stops at pointers)

My guess is no, but I just wanted to make sure...

(disclaimer: the opinions posted above are MINE, not the person's from whose
account I'm posting this rant)

- Raw text -