| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| Path: | news.mv.net!news.shore.net!newsfeed.mathworks.com!newsfeed.direct.ca!look.ca!paloalto-snh1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!dfiatx1-snr1.gtei.net.POSTED!not-for-mail |
| From: | "Damian Yerrick" <snews AT pineight DOT 8m DOT comMUNIST-PIGS-AOL> |
| Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.programmer,comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
| References: | <s2ik5.11438$gW5 DOT 735021 AT bgtnsc04-news DOT ops DOT worldnet DOT att DOT net> <srh3ps8f0jc69k4tq5emivk7qe94vf6g1c AT 4ax DOT com> <8n65c7$708 AT nntp DOT seflin DOT org> <njedpssuifm20prj5eg71kpo329s3cir94 AT 4ax DOT com> <39B4FA72 DOT 4943D810 AT inXSformatics DOT net> |
| Subject: | Re: Borland 4.5 C/C++ compiler problem |
| Lines: | 17 |
| Organization: | Pin Eight Software <http://pineight.8m.com/> |
| X-Priority: | 3 |
| X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal |
| X-Newsreader: | Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 |
| X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 |
| Message-ID: | <QPht5.2822$zc6.364333@dfiatx1-snr1.gtei.net> |
| X-Trace: | /w3Za9VKE/Y/CeLVNLlbBBGbYgRv1mVi3tWue5KcQ6HLvxxizjbyJHlx004nxep5lL2/LIIncCyk!q2MwRYlluvjycC3lBm+0gUWi9v8fALOk0PEOzS2zEHSvtTh0k/nhCiPNJHW8K7Mf2oFm+U1oVryE!LrcKlzOw |
| X-Complaints-To: | abuse AT gte DOT net |
| X-Abuse-Info: | Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers |
| X-Abuse-Info: | Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly |
| NNTP-Posting-Date: | Wed, 06 Sep 2000 02:18:24 GMT |
| Distribution: | world |
| Date: | Wed, 06 Sep 2000 02:18:25 GMT |
| Xref: | news.mv.net comp.os.msdos.programmer:110146 comp.os.msdos.djgpp:103191 |
"JohnT" <jrt AT inXSformatics DOT net> wrote: > > I was browsing around comp.os.msdos.djgpp and found the problem > of parts of the disk being marked "unmoveable". I'm not sure, but > think this may be due to DOS sessions running under Windows and > getting some kind of undocumented crap written to files or clusters > by Windows. My system had two hard drives for a while, one used > as backup, and I would get rid of the unmoveable clusters by doing > a backup, reformat and copying all the files back. The exact flag > that causes the "unmoveable" designation I don't know about, but > documented file attributes don't have a bit that means "unmoveable". > Anyone got a good guess on this? "Hidden" files and "system" files are considered by defraggers to be fixed in position so as not to break some programs' copy protection.
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |