delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: djgpp/2000/09/03/07:00:12.1

From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: The Future of DJGPP
Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2000 22:02:05 +0100
Organization: Customer of Energis Squared
Lines: 45
Message-ID: <39B16ACD.F45CD739@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
References: <967904615 DOT 832712 AT shelley DOT paradise DOT net DOT nz>
NNTP-Posting-Host: modem-105.americium.dialup.pol.co.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: newsg1.svr.pol.co.uk 967976658 29062 62.136.67.105 (3 Sep 2000 10:24:18 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: 3 Sep 2000 10:24:18 GMT
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT theplanet DOT net
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.14 i586)
X-Accept-Language: de,fr
Path: news.mv.net!newspeer.phoen-x.net!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!diablo.theplanet.net!news.theplanet.net!newspost.theplanet.net!iolanthe.int.phekda.freeserve.co.uk!nobody
Xref: news.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:103120

Hello.

Edmund Horner wrote:
> Where does DJGPP go in the future?  (I guess that it will continue to
> follow the direction of gcc, such as support for more languages.  But
> what else?)

A quick look at the changelog in DJGPP CVS, I see that post-2.03 changes
include:

* Support for FAT32 drives;
* Better compatibility with GCC built-ins;
* Symlink support;
* Bugfixes.

A lot of work is going into making DJGPP work with the upcoming gcc 3.0.

> Will DJGPP become too tied to ye olde DOS to remain of use?

Why would you want to use DJGPP on anything other than DOS?

For Windows there's Cygwin, although DJGPP also works pretty well on
Windows '9x. I haven't used it much under Windows NT, but I guess it works
better now there's a good LFN driver for NT.

Some of the libraries for DJGPP are available for other platforms, so
DJGPP is going to be useful for a while, with its source-level
portability.

> What is there for non-contributors like myself to do to participate?  I
> feel I owe DJGPP something, and would like to help.  What needs to be
> done?

I guess you could help test out the pre-release versions of ports, e.g.
Mark E's port of bash 2.04:

    http://members.xoom.com/snowball3/djgpp/

This is in beta right now.

Bye,

-- 
Richard Dawe
[ mailto:richdawe AT bigfoot DOT com | http://www.bigfoot.com/~richdawe/ ]

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019