From:	pjfarley AT banet DOT net (Peter J. Farley III)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Q: libc fstat: Why is st_ctime < st_atime == st_mtime after fopen?
Date:	Tue, 29 Aug 2000 13:37:27 GMT
Message-ID:	<39abbc28.1013932@news3.banet.net>
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1000829100455 DOT 26101A AT is>
X-Newsreader:	Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243
NNTP-Posting-Host:	32.100.77.244
X-Trace:	29 Aug 2000 13:36:26 GMT, 32.100.77.244
Organization:	Global Network Services - Remote Access Mail & News Services
Lines:	17
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT prserv DOT net
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> wrote:
>On Tue, 29 Aug 2000, I wrote:
>
>> Careful testing 
>> demonstrates that ctime might be behind mtime and the system clock by as 
>> much as 3 seconds(!).
>
>Sorry, this is inaccurate and might be confusing.  The correct wording is 
>this: mtime might be ahead of ctime and the system clock by as much as 3 
>seconds.

Understood.  For perl purposes, the fact that they are *not* equal is
sufficient.  Thanks for the clarification, though.

----------------------------------------------------
Peter J. Farley III (pjfarley AT nospam DOT dorsai DOT org OR
                     pjfarley AT nospam DOT banet DOT net)

- Raw text -