Date:	Tue, 29 Aug 2000 10:06:26 +0300 (IDT)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	"Peter J. Farley III" <pjfarley AT banet DOT net>, djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Q: libc fstat: Why is st_ctime < st_atime == st_mtime after fopen?
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1000829084432.25491G-100000@is>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1000829100455.26101A@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, 29 Aug 2000, I wrote:

> Careful testing 
> demonstrates that ctime might be behind mtime and the system clock by as 
> much as 3 seconds(!).

Sorry, this is inaccurate and might be confusing.  The correct wording is 
this: mtime might be ahead of ctime and the system clock by as much as 3 
seconds.

- Raw text -