Date:	Fri, 25 Aug 2000 10:39:45 -0400
Message-Id:	<200008251439.KAA20175@envy.delorie.com>
From:	DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<llpcqsk25p2d7vkam96fljcorr1k3jva79@4ax.com> (message from
	AndrewJ on Fri, 25 Aug 2000 12:31:24 GMT)
Subject:	Re: Watcom C++ opened?
References:	<uuo5qsg1nj0uisvlj8dbum16k9r0cvv4ae AT 4ax DOT com> <200008222126 DOT RAA23165 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <mucaqs0p06etnaldu00atmcnbci1o5tsoa AT 4ax DOT com> <7458-Fri25Aug2000105450+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <llpcqsk25p2d7vkam96fljcorr1k3jva79 AT 4ax DOT com>
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> But I am curious, how is asserting that a product has /more/ lines
> of code making a case for it?

Lines of code is a totally useless measure of software, unless you're
in marketing.

- Raw text -