Mail Archives: djgpp/2000/08/25/08:16:46
From: | Radical NetSurfer <radsmail AT juno DOT com>
|
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp
|
Subject: | Re: BAD strupr, BAD getw
|
Date: | Fri, 25 Aug 2000 07:57:26 -0400
|
Message-ID: | <2mncqsos70c6u5losbrrlrq9qq2esrm9t0@4ax.com>
|
References: | <ue4cqsg0k83m0461605mnkssjo43odacen AT 4ax DOT com>
|
X-Newsreader: | Forte Agent 1.8/32.548
|
X-No-Archive: | yes
|
MIME-Version: | 1.0
|
NNTP-Posting-Host: | 216.202.134.204
|
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: | 216.202.134.204
|
X-Trace: | 25 Aug 2000 08:00:22 -0400, 216.202.134.204
|
Lines: | 28
|
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: | 64.31.79.51
|
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com
|
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
|
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com
|
Dear Steamer:
I've never seen Builder (Console or Windows compiler) actually
display/incorportate flawed data read by getw()
(although most stuff I get/convert uses fread() to ensure the
proper number bytes) (ah, thats B Y T E guys, as in 8-bits; or has
DJGPP also decided to CHANGE that too?),
Just how many of these "standards" has DJGPP decided to
alter?
NIBBLE == 4 bits (Single BCD value)
BYTE == 8
WORD == 16
DWORD ==32
QWORD ==64
etc
On Fri, 25 Aug 2000 10:11:19 GMT, dontmailme AT iname DOT com (Steamer)
wrote:
>By the way, this is nothing to do with DJGPP - Borland C++ 5.5
>does exactly the same, and DJGPP is just copying Borland or
>Microsoft's getw() anyway, since this is not a standard function.
>
>S.
- Raw text -