delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Message-ID: | <399F3B95.585EC230@hotmail.com> |
From: | the Icefalcon <kourino AT hotmail DOT com> |
Organization: | Harumichi Otaku ... doko ni mo! |
X-Mailer: | Mozilla 4.05 [en] (Win95; U) |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Subject: | SIGTSTP |
Lines: | 12 |
Date: | Sun, 20 Aug 2000 01:53:22 GMT |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | 12.85.128.30 |
X-Complaints-To: | abuse AT worldnet DOT att DOT net |
X-Trace: | bgtnsc07-news.ops.worldnet.att.net 966736402 12.85.128.30 (Sun, 20 Aug 2000 01:53:22 GMT) |
NNTP-Posting-Date: | Sun, 20 Aug 2000 01:53:22 GMT |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
cl/cl_funcs.c uses it in the nvi source. A page describes it as "an interactive stop signal" that can be handled or ignored (unlike SIGSTOP), but in a different place it also says that the SUSP character that usually causes SIGTSTP to be sent is "recognized only if the implementation supports job control". I'm guessing DJGPP doesn't ... ? At least, it's mentioned on delorie.com's GNU pages but not in anything related to DJGPP, and it's not defined in DJGPP's signal.h. For the moment I'm just throwing in a -DSIGTSTP=SIGABRT to the makefile since there's also no SIGSTOP (since no job control) ... This is safe, right? -- -|-E the Icefalcon
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |