Date:	Fri, 18 Aug 2000 08:29:53 +0300 (IDT)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	Rafał Maj <r_maj AT poczta DOT onet DOT pl>
cc:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Odp: delete OR delete[] ?
In-Reply-To:	<8nh5qk$h21$2@info.cyf-kr.edu.pl>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1000818082756.29393F-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, 17 Aug 2000, Rafa=B3 Maj wrote:

> > No offense, but someone, who is just learning how to use
> > delete, should not try to overload delete.
>=20
> I now that my question was wery simple, but I hope I'm NOT a newbie (at
> least in using new/delete).
> I asked this question because I think, that ther was a bug in C++ book, f=
rom
> witch I was learning.

May I suggest that in the future you tell all those relevant details up=20
front, and make your questions somewhat less general?

Not only will this prevent you from having to explain that you know what=20
you are talking about, it will also allow those who reply be much more=20
efficient in the help they give you.

Thanks.

- Raw text -