Date:	Thu, 17 Aug 2000 08:28:21 +0200
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Message-Id:	<2110-Thu17Aug2000082820+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.2.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.5b
In-reply-to:	<399a9c89.5408648@news.telepath.com>
	(remove DOT this DOT part DOT AND DOT the DOT underscore_hacker DOT jack AT juno DOT com)
Subject:	Re: X-DOS: anybody knows about it? (small free DOS)
References:	<3988750B DOT 3823E163 AT inti DOT gov DOT ar> <399a9c89 DOT 5408648 AT news DOT telepath DOT com>
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: remove DOT this DOT part DOT AND DOT the DOT underscore_hacker DOT jack AT juno DOT com (Kurt McKee)
> Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
> Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 03:13:33 GMT
> 
> As far as I know, you will never find a DOS of any sort that
> implements '.' or '..'

Actually, some network redirectors do implement these.  I think some
of the CD-ROM formats also have these in the root directory.

> you'll never find '..' on the root since '..' means
> "parent directory". This is obviously impossible when at the root of
> the drive!

Of course, it's possile: just make ".." point to the root itself.
That's what Unix filesystems do, and that's what the DJGPP library's
emulation of "c:/.." does as well.  It works so well that I'm guessing
no one until now was aware of that.

- Raw text -