From:	Hans-Bernhard Broeker <broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: newbie makelong?
Date:	16 Aug 2000 12:09:15 GMT
Organization:	Aachen University of Technology (RWTH)
Lines:	22
Message-ID:	<8ne09b$ihr$1@nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE>
References:	<39985C49 DOT 3542BDAC AT ntlworld DOT com> <39986125 DOT 80837DE6 AT ntlworld DOT com> <nc0hps4fm0poukns0ipc59k7d6ssb8goog AT 4ax DOT com> <399987A3 DOT 141A6A49 AT ntlworld DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	acp3bf.physik.rwth-aachen.de
X-Trace:	nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE 966427755 19003 137.226.32.75 (16 Aug 2000 12:09:15 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT rwth-aachen DOT de
NNTP-Posting-Date:	16 Aug 2000 12:09:15 GMT
Originator:	broeker@
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Steven Watson <steven DOT watson AT ntlworld DOT com> wrote:
[...]
> Thanks for pointing out the non portability I dont have 
> NT just win95 I will have to look for a portable way
> the code comes from a Tutorial on C circular 1994, 

IMHO, you should seriously reconsider your choice of tutorial.  That
one you're using is *not* a tutorial on C, but a tutorial on 'PC-C': a
strange dialect that legions of coders, who grew up with C on DOS
machines or read bad books or tutorials like the one you're looking
at, came to believe was 'the' C programming language. It isn't.  In
particular, it isn't anywhere near portable, by definition.

There are still way too many books in the stores that claim to teach
C, but indeed teach PC-C (or, these days, Windows-C the even worse
contraption 'C/C++'). It pays off in the long term to avoid those like
the plague.


-- 
Hans-Bernhard Broeker (broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de)
Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.

- Raw text -