From:	Nate Eldredge <neldredge AT hmc DOT edu>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.programmer,comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Borland 4.5 C/C++ compiler problem
Date:	13 Aug 2000 12:07:50 -0700
Organization:	Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
Lines:	19
Sender:	nate AT mercury DOT bitbucket
Message-ID:	<83sns9ughl.fsf@mercury.bitbucket>
References:	<s2ik5.11438$gW5 DOT 735021 AT bgtnsc04-news DOT ops DOT worldnet DOT att DOT net> <srh3ps8f0jc69k4tq5emivk7qe94vf6g1c AT 4ax DOT com> <8n65c7$708 AT nntp DOT seflin DOT org> <njedpssuifm20prj5eg71kpo329s3cir94 AT 4ax DOT com>
X-Complaints-To:	newsabuse AT supernews DOT com
User-Agent:	Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.5
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Damian Yerrick <Bullcr_pd_yerrick AT hotmail DOT comRemoveBullcr_p> writes:

> On 13 Aug 2000 12:47:03 GMT, d021317c AT dc DOT seflin DOT org (Marshall Price)
> wrote:
> 
> >  32 is such a *large* number!
> >  Besides, I discovered DEFRAG was reporting more and more of my hard
> >drive "unmovable."  When I got away from DJGPP and CWSDPMI and GO32 (or
> >*something*), I stopped having those problems.
> 
> This is strange.  comp.os.msdos.djgpp added

Does DJGPP set the hidden or system bits on anything?  This is the
usual reason for immovability wrt defragmenters, IME.  Hmm... swapfile?

-- 

Nate Eldredge
neldredge AT hmc DOT edu

- Raw text -