From:	AndrewJ <luminous-is AT REMOVE DOT home DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Vs: WATCOM vs. DJGPP
Message-ID:	<30nlos8quhd91u6fmss6usvlvtgr5mgi3e@4ax.com>
References:	<39874ce2 DOT 50081575 AT news DOT wins DOT uva DOT nl> <Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 21 DOT 0008020650100 DOT 4277-100000 AT roadrunner DOT grendel DOT net> <2qcgoso5cv0i6qllki9pqih2jc05ptl9n6 AT 4ax DOT com> <39889290 DOT 47727347 AT news DOT wins DOT uva DOT nl>
X-Newsreader:	Forte Agent 1.7/32.534
MIME-Version:	1.0
Lines:	24
Date:	Fri, 04 Aug 2000 15:07:55 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host:	24.42.120.18
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT home DOT net
X-Trace:	news2.rdc1.on.home.com 965401675 24.42.120.18 (Fri, 04 Aug 2000 08:07:55 PDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Fri, 04 Aug 2000 08:07:55 PDT
Organization:	Excite AT Home - The Leader in Broadband
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

On this day Wed, 02 Aug 2000 22:06:19 GMT, some guy named eglebbk AT dds DOT nl (Evert
Glebbeek) wrote:

><snip>
>>  And AFAIK, there are no time-limited versions
>>of compilers.  

>Years ago, a BASIC compiler called PowerBASIC was released in both a
>commercial and try-before-you buy version. This had a thirty-day limit
>but. I'm not sure if the limit was enforced though, since I only tried
>it for a week and decided that the fact that it couldn't load any
>sources kept me from checking it out properly. Dumped BASIC altogether
>soon after.

Apologies.  When I think of the word compiler, only C/C++ and Objective-C come
to mind (okay, sometimes Pascal...).

BASIC sucks.  BASIC compilers, therefore, suck. ;)

--------
Andrew J

"This is a wonderful answer.  It's off-topic, it's incorrect, and it doesn't
answer the question." - Richard Heathfield.

- Raw text -