Mail Archives: djgpp/2000/07/27/18:02:18
Hello.
Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> On Thu, 27 Jul 2000, Kalum Somaratna aka Grendel wrote:
>
> > Actually although having a DSM in the zip file would help, if there
> > isn't a DSM in a zip, I think zippo should use it's own pre written
> > DSM's (it comes with several) and try to install it..
>
> The default DSMs must be so general that they are useless. We might
> as well ask that zippo be able to install without any DSM anywhere in
> sight. All it takes is unzip the package and pray...
I think there's a bit of confusion here. I think Kalum is referring to the
DSMs that are distributed with zippo. On the to-do list is a way of
matching the ZIP file name to its parent package, when the ZIP file does
not contain a DSM. That way a user could do e.g.:
zippo -i sed302b.zip
sed302b.zip does not (IIRC) contain a DSM. Since zippo has a small
database of available packages, it could scan this and match sed302b.zip
to the parent DSM. Then it knows how to install sed.
I don't think Kalum was suggesting that we have a generic default DSM.
That would be pretty useless.
BTW I don't that distributing a lot of DSMs with zippo is the way to go.
As I mentioned before, zippo should ship with a few necessary DSMs until
all packages contain DSMs. Then we can remove the DSMs distributed with
zippo, since they will no longer be needed.
Bye, Rich =]
--
Richard Dawe
[ mailto:richdawe AT bigfoot DOT com | http://www.bigfoot.com/~richdawe/ ]
- Raw text -