Date:	Thu, 27 Jul 2000 18:38:43 +0600 (LKT)
From:	Kalum Somaratna aka Grendel <kalum AT lintux DOT cx>
X-Sender:	kalum AT roadrunner DOT grendel DOT net
To:	Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
cc:	Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>, zippo-workers AT egroups DOT com,
	djgpp AT delorie DOT com, Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Subject:	Re: [zippo-workers] Re: ANNOUNCE: DJGPP port of GNU Make 3.79.1
	uploaded
In-Reply-To:	<397F27B5.83D7100E@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Message-ID:	<Pine.LNX.4.21.0007271835090.4766-100000@roadrunner.grendel.net>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Wed, 26 Jul 2000, Richard Dawe spoke the following immortal words,

> Thinking about this today, I think we should aim for the following: get
> zippo to handle install/uninstall well. Then we can work on the upgrade
> options, etc. Once install/uninstall works well, we can release for
> general use.

Actually I find that zippo already handles the install quite well,
actually it is possible to install DJGPP from scratch...

> 
> I've been putting DSMs in the packages that I've producing. If nothing
> else, having a DSM makes it easier to test binary distributions in a DJGPP
> installation.

Actually although having a DSM in the zip file would help, if there isn't
a DSM in a zip, I think zippo should use it's own pre written DSM's (it
comes with several) and try to install it..

Grendel

Hi, I'm a signature virus. plz set me as your signature and help me spread
:)

- Raw text -