From:	"Tim 'Zastai' Van Holder" <zastai AT hotmail DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
References:	<396B1A7E DOT 538133EE AT ujf-grenoble DOT fr>
Subject:	Re: bootstrap comparison failure when building gcc-2952s
Lines:	18
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Newsreader:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Message-ID:	<LoFa5.104733$HL2.1790123@afrodite.telenet-ops.be>
Date:	Tue, 11 Jul 2000 13:35:39 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host:	213.224.63.5
X-Trace:	afrodite.telenet-ops.be 963322539 213.224.63.5 (Tue, 11 Jul 2000 15:35:39 MET DST)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Tue, 11 Jul 2000 15:35:39 MET DST
Organization:	Pandora - Met vlotte tred op Internet
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Maurice Lombardi <Maurice DOT Lombardi AT ujf-grenoble DOT fr> wrote in message
news:396B1A7E DOT 538133EE AT ujf-grenoble DOT fr...
> The file build.djg/compare.log contains the following messages at end
> [snip]
Hmmm. Back in my younger days, when I last compiled gcc 2.95.2, I ran into a
similar problem. It is PROBABLY caused by some switch being used differently
in the steps (maybe CFLAGS was set in the environment?), and is likely
harmless.
For me, the problem went away after cleaning the tree and rebuilding from
scratch (like you, I was worried something was broken).

--
Hi, I'm a signature virus. plz set me as your signature and help me spread
:)

- Raw text -