From:	Sean Proctor <sproctor AT ccs DOT neu DOT edu>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Random Numbers?
Message-ID:	<g1l4mso3h3hote2qeh6ehtf2mjo8jva5es@4ax.com>
References:	<Vzl85.6589$MS3 DOT 136169 AT news1 DOT online DOT no> <0104ms87u2hnotrl96vre4g12upkdmnrbu AT 4ax DOT com>
X-Newsreader:	Forte Agent 1.7/32.534
MIME-Version:	1.0
Lines:	11
Date:	Tue, 04 Jul 2000 21:14:14 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host:	207.16.153.219
X-Complaints-To:	Abuse Role <abuse AT enter DOT net>, We Care <abuse AT newsread DOT com>
X-Trace:	newshog.newsread.com 962745254 207.16.153.219 (Tue, 04 Jul 2000 17:14:14 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Tue, 04 Jul 2000 17:14:14 EDT
Organization:	ENTER.net (enter.net)
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, 04 Jul 2000 15:23:08 GMT, Damian Yerrick
<Bullcr_pd_yerrick AT hotmail DOT comRemoveBullcr_p> wrote:


>  return rand() * (long long)range / (RAND_MAX + (long long)1) + min;
I think better would be:
return (rand() % (max - min + 1)) + min;
as you don't have to use long long ints and do multiplication and
division with them... etc.

Sean

- Raw text -