| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| Date: | Tue, 4 Jul 2000 08:25:23 +0300 (IDT) |
| From: | Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
| X-Sender: | eliz AT is |
| To: | Nate Eldredge <neldredge AT hmc DOT edu> |
| cc: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| Subject: | Re: Where can I get a Thread safe malloc debugger? |
| In-Reply-To: | <83bt0ev8el.fsf@mercury.bitbucket> |
| Message-ID: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000704081746.818A-100000@is> |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Mailing-List: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On 3 Jul 2000, Nate Eldredge wrote: > No, they really are the same thing. Trust me ;-). Both of them call > mprotect(...,PROT_NONE). This causes one or more pages to be unmapped > from the process's address space. But neither use any more elaborate > "protection" than this. I might be mistaken (I looked at efence a long time ago), but I think it also requires mmap and /dev/zero.
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |