Sender:	tr AT bgl2 DOT vsnl DOT net DOT in
Message-ID:	<3933E76B.D40B23B6@yahoo.com>
Date:	Tue, 30 May 2000 21:38:11 +0530
From:	Prashant TR <prashant_tr AT yahoo DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.51 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.5-15 i586)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Linux
References:	<Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 21 DOT 0005301941250 DOT 1881-100000 AT roadrunner DOT grendel DOT net>
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Kalum Somaratna aka Grendel wrote:

> You may also be getting a lot more corrupted FAT systems than *real DOS*
> produces...

I've been using this for quite sometime. DOSEmu 1.0 is quite stable, IMHO and
I've so far, never run into *any* problems with FS corruption. So, IMHO this
is more comfortable.

- Raw text -