Message-Id:	<200005260833.LAA05176@mailgw1.netvision.net.il>
Date:	Fri, 26 May 2000 11:32:24 +0200
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To:	Mikkel DOT Hansen AT borsen DOT dk
Cc:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailer:	WinNT's Blat ver 1.8.5b
In-reply-to:	<8girrm$sqk$1@news1.tele.dk> (Mikkel.Hansen@borsen.dk)
Subject:	Re: win2k
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1000518180607 DOT 15189I-100000 AT is> <39242621_3 AT news2 DOT prserv DOT net> <1kodisg6iq1484nn16gq4o50r4kbjmvmrr AT 4ax DOT com> <39279d2a_1 AT news2 DOT prserv DOT net> <8girrm$sqk$1 AT news1 DOT tele DOT dk>
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: "Mikkel Hansen \(NEO\)" <Mikkel DOT Hansen AT borsen DOT dk>
> Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
> Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 11:28:53 +0200
> 
> Any idea when this Windows2k bug will be fixed? I'm itching to produce
> some funny .exe's under w2k :)

None of the DJGPP developers has access to Windows 2000.  Experience
shows that the best person to solve a problem is the one who has the
greatest motivation to see it solved.  So how about if you sit down,
dig into this problem, and report any results here?  I posted a while
back a few issues that I suggest to investigate, which could help us
find a work-around or a solution.

If you don't think you are knowledgeable enough for this job, please
take into consideration that you will always get help here.

Thanks in advance!

- Raw text -