From:	Richard Dawe <richdawe AT bigfoot DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: size_t
Date:	Mon, 22 May 2000 21:10:07 +0100
Organization:	Customer of Planet Online
Lines:	33
Message-ID:	<3929941F.C60E027E@bigfoot.com>
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1000518173007 DOT 15189B AT is> <3923FDDD DOT 2186F25 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <39270C85 DOT BB52285C AT mtu-net DOT ru> <3928150C DOT 8B6BF9CD AT bigfoot DOT com> <392846EF DOT B95361CD AT mtu-net DOT ru>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	modem-84.iodine.dialup.pol.co.uk
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	newsg3.svr.pol.co.uk 959105619 19085 62.136.44.84 (23 May 2000 18:13:39 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	23 May 2000 18:13:39 GMT
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT theplanet DOT net
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.51 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.14 i586)
X-Accept-Language:	de,fr
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

"Alexei A. Frounze" wrote:
> 
> Richard Dawe wrote:
> >
> > Hello.
> >
> > "Alexei A. Frounze" wrote:
> > > DO YOU HAVE ANY IDEAS ABOUT THIS (size_t<->fpos_t and other types
> > > conversion/casting)???
> >
> > The relative sizes will probably be described in the C standard - i.e.
> > short is smaller than long, int is the same size as short or bigger,
> > or the same size as long or smaller. This should tell you what
> > typecasts are safe.
> 
> Actual question was not about type casting in general. It was about type
> casting for such things as size_t and fpos_t.

Er, it was, unless I don't understand English anymore:

"and other types conversion/casting"

As I said, the C standard probably has the answer. You mentioned C9X in
another posting - this now been ratified as C99. Please read a draft of
C99.

Bye,

-- 
Richard Dawe
richdawe AT bigfoot DOT com ICQ 47595498 http://www.bigfoot.com/~richdawe/

- Raw text -