From:	"Alexei A. Frounze" <alex DOT fru AT mtu-net DOT ru>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: C++, complex, etc
Date:	Mon, 22 May 2000 23:57:32 +0400
Organization:	MTU-Intel ISP
Lines:	23
Message-ID:	<3929912C.78341995@mtu-net.ru>
References:	<391F1402 DOT 31B7D4A6 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <39296C7F DOT EBAD5F08 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <392980F2 DOT 55EF34E7 AT maths DOT unine DOT ch>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	ppp103-117.dialup.mtu-net.ru
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	gavrilo.mtu.ru 959025796 73280 212.188.103.117 (22 May 2000 20:03:16 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	usenet-abuse AT mtu DOT ru
NNTP-Posting-Date:	22 May 2000 20:03:16 GMT
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Accept-Language:	ru,en
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

what's that?

Gautier wrote:
> 
> "Alexei A. Frounze":
> 
> > Btw, today I've visited gcc.gnu.org. I found there some kind of
> > spec/standard named C9X. There is stated (in a table) that COMPLEX.H is
> > implemented either buggy or something like that (i.e. not correctly).
> 
> > Maybe you can visit it as well and try to explain me what that means?
> 
> Maybe the bugfix is there ? http://www.adapower.com/rm95/arm95_319.html
> 
> :-) G.

-- 
Alexei A. Frounze
-----------------------------------------
Homepage: http://alexfru.chat.ru
Mirror:   http://members.xoom.com/alexfru

- Raw text -