Mail Archives: djgpp/2000/05/18/15:32:52
I don't think I'm the only person who dislike absence of standard things in
the real world.
If all the compilers worked the same way for a user/programmer and had the
same interfaces for standard libraries, programming would be pretty
pleasant.
--
Alexei A. Frounze
-----------------------------------------
Homepage: http://alexfru.chat.ru
Mirror: http://members.xoom.com/alexfru
J-P wrote:
>
> In article <3923B96E DOT 77F5890A AT mtu-net DOT ru>,
> Alexei A. Frounze <djgpp AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> >> Welcome to C++. If you don't like languages that are not standardized
> >> enough, don't use C++, at least not just yet.
> >
> >Yup. Very friendly programming language. :))
>
> What's unfriendly about not yet having a standard? Sorry standardizing
> isn't quick enough for you. All you have to do is put up with a few quirks
> in the different implementations between different compilers.
>
> Can't you do this in C? Or do your complex mathematics another way? I
> can't believe you *need* special functions to do the mathematics, although
> I can understand them making them easier.
>
> If you don't like C++, then don't use it. But don't go round complaining
> about how its current lack of exact standard is a real bummer for you to
> have to put up with, because, fundamentally, you don't have to put up with
> it.
>
> J-P
> --
> Smart stock market investing: keep a close eye on Dan Aykroyd and Eddie
> Murphy. They may try to outfox you and your cold-hearted brother.
- Raw text -