Message-ID:	<3923FDDD.2186F25@mtu-net.ru>
Date:	Thu, 18 May 2000 18:27:41 +0400
From:	"Alexei A. Frounze" <alex DOT fru AT mtu-net DOT ru>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Accept-Language:	ru,en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Cc:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	size_t
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1000518173007 DOT 15189B AT is>
X-Recipient:	eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 18 May 2000, Alexei A. Frounze wrote:
> 
> > > > If it's a standard type, what is it needed for then? Isn't int enough?
> > >
> > > No, it isn't enough.  If it were enough, the ANSI comittee would not have
> > > invented it.
> >
> > Like fpos_t which depends on file system?
> 
> Yes, fpos_t is another example of such a type.  ptrdiff_t is yet another.

Okay, I agree about this. But does that mean we read books which teach us to
make buggy programs? There usually used "int" and "long int" instead of
"size_t" and "fpos_t". 

People, plese say who has such books. I wanna know how many of you have
them.

-- 
Alexei A. Frounze
-----------------------------------------
Homepage: http://alexfru.chat.ru
Mirror:   http://members.xoom.com/alexfru

- Raw text -