Date:	Thu, 18 May 2000 18:43:30 +0300 (IDT)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	"Alexei A. Frounze" <alex DOT fru AT mtu-net DOT ru>
cc:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: C++, complex, etc
In-Reply-To:	<3923FEC5.B836D26B@mtu-net.ru>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1000518184200.15189T-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, 18 May 2000, Alexei A. Frounze wrote:

> > In general, you don't want to assign int to size_t or vice versa.  Mixing
> > signed and unsigned means trouble.
> 
> If I'm 100% sure my "int" is positive (greater or equal 0 and less than
> INT_MAX), will I have problems?

No, in that case it will work, assuming that sizeof(int) <= sizeof(size_t).

> Again, if I have "int" in the 0...INT_MAX range, do I have those problems?

Again, no, under the same assumption.

- Raw text -