delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | buers AT gmx DOT de (Dieter Buerssner) |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Subject: | Re: C++, complex, etc |
Date: | 18 May 2000 11:54:27 GMT |
Lines: | 9 |
Message-ID: | <8g0s1u.3vs6833.0@buerssner-17104.user.cis.dfn.de> |
References: | <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1000518113013 DOT 12245H-100000 AT is> |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | pec-117-140.tnt8.s2.uunet.de (149.225.117.140) |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Trace: | fu-berlin.de 958650867 488915 149.225.117.140 (16 [17104]) |
X-Posting-Agent: | Hamster/1.3.13.0 |
User-Agent: | Xnews/03.02.04 |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Eli Zaretskii wrote: >You said "if both size_t and int equal the same machine word". >Hans-Bernhard is telling you that that's a big ``if'', and a portable >program cannot rely on that fact, or even verify it reliably. Of course, int can never be the same type as size_t, because size_t must be an unsigned integral type. For the verifying: You certainly know about limits.h, which should be reliable.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |