Date:	Mon, 15 May 2000 10:53:33 +0300 (IDT)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: C++, complex, etc
In-Reply-To:	<taKT4.110$%a4.10296@nsw.nnrp.telstra.net>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1000515105310.9209N-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Mon, 15 May 2000, Paul Cechner wrote:

> perhaps you should try
> #include <complex>
> instead of
> #include <complex.h>

These two headers are identical (actually, <complex.h> includes
<complex>).

> > #include <_Complex.h>
> I hear that the reason headers are named using the mentioned convention  is
> because of the non-case sensitivity of ms-dos based OSs...
> 
> perhaps this is just a load of half-remembered half-truths from a half-c++
> programmer with not much experience with djgpp :)

No, this is from the DJGPP FAQ (section 8.3).

- Raw text -