>Received:	from devaure by lai.leroy-autom.com; Wed, 10 May 2000 15:22:51 +0200
Message-ID:	<012401bfba82$d7dd90c0$3eefa8c0@leroyautom.com>
From:	"Alexandre Devaure" <Alexandre DOT Devaure AT leroy-autom DOT com>
To:	"Kalum Somaratna aka Grendel" <kalum AT lintux DOT cx>, <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
References:	<Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 10 DOT 10005101819180 DOT 2440-100000 AT roadrunner DOT grendel DOT net>
Subject:	Re: temp files
Date:	Wed, 10 May 2000 15:22:51 +0200
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Thanks, it's what I want.
I searched in info but not in the good section.
Alex

----- Original Message -----
From: Kalum Somaratna aka Grendel <kalum AT lintux DOT cx>
To: <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Cc: <Alexandre DOT Devaure AT leroy-autom DOT com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2000 2:21 PM
Subject: Re: temp files


> On Wed, 10 May 2000, Alexandre Devaure wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I'd like gcc don't erase the temp files produced during the different
> > compilation stage. Is it possible ? I didn't see any options to do that.
>
> The -save-temps option is probably what you want...just do a "info gcc"
> and search for save-temps to find out more about it...
> Heres the discription,
>
>
> `-save-temps'
>      Store the usual "temporary" intermediate files permanently; place
>      them in the current directory and name them based on the source
>      file.  Thus, compiling `foo.c' with `-c -save-temps' would produce
>      files `foo.i' and `foo.s', as well as `foo.o'.
>
>
> Grendel
>
> Hi, I'm a signature virus. plz set me as your signature and help me spread
> :)
>

- Raw text -