From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: gdb problem or just silly me - please help
Date:	Mon, 08 May 2000 20:47:40 +0200
Organization:	NetVision Israel
Lines:	21
Message-ID:	<39170BCC.EA7F2595@is.elta.co.il>
References:	<Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 10 DOT 10005071332080 DOT 868-100000 AT roadrunner DOT grendel DOT net> <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1000508111118 DOT 1993G-100000 AT is> <0oidhsovvtqs9ga2fnfoqar6vphbpdspo2 AT 4ax DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	ras1-p109.rvt.netvision.net.il
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	news.netvision.net.il 957808075 1010 62.0.172.111 (8 May 2000 17:47:55 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT netvision DOT net DOT il
NNTP-Posting-Date:	8 May 2000 17:47:55 GMT
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language:	en,ru,hebrew
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Damian Yerrick wrote:
> 
> >The addition of LFN functionality when Windows starts is analogous to
> >the additional functionality in, say, keyboard remapping that you get
> >on Unix when you start X.  I fail to see how does this reveal anything
> >(good or bad) about the design.
> 
> That LFN support is tied to having Windows resident in RAM.
> That keyboard remapping is tied to having X resident in RAM.

LFN is a feature of Windows; keyboard remapping is a feature of X.  You
cannot have the feature without starting the package that provides it.

> Product tying is thought to be bad and to result in bloatware;
> hence the *n?x philosophy of "one tool for one job".

A package as large and complex as Windows or X cannot be a tool for a single
job.  If it were, you would need to spend eons to set up all of those one-job
tools so they work.  You'd need a separate tool for graphics, another one for
mouse, yet another for keyboard, one more for fonts, etc., etc.  It would be
a user's nightmare (not that it isn't already ;-).

- Raw text -