| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| Date: | Thu, 4 May 2000 09:27:09 +0300 (IDT) |
| From: | Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
| X-Sender: | eliz AT is |
| To: | Alexandre Devaure <Alexandre DOT Devaure AT leroy-autom DOT com> |
| cc: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| Subject: | Re: structures size |
| In-Reply-To: | <TCVP4.3574$724.7298116@nnrp5.proxad.net> |
| Message-ID: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000504092557.16176B-100000@is> |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Mailing-List: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Wed, 3 May 2000, Alexandre Devaure wrote: > I'd like the size of my structures is the same that in Borland C because my > program need to read a structure in flash written by a program developed > under Borland C. So, I want to use the -fpack-struct option at compilation > time. But it has no effect on the structure size and I need to add the > packed attribute on each structure. C programs or C++ programs? Can you post a short test program and its compilation command line, which can be used to reproduce this problem?
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |